Ellen Knox, West Midlands Perinatal Institute
Fidelma Dunne, Birmingham Univ. & Selly Oak Hospital
October 2001
Established Diabetes Mellitus (Types 1 and 2) is the
most common pre existing medical condition to affect
pregnant women with a frequency of 2-5/1000 pregnancies
( 1).
Although common this means that in a unit delivering
4000 babies per year there will only be 8-20 cases
each year. This reinforces the need for diabetic mothers
to be managed in joint clinics with a named obstetrician
and physician and standardised protocols for management.
Why is it a problem?
Risks to mother |
Risks to fetus |
Miscarriage
|
Congenital abnormality/miscarriage
|
Hypoglycaemia/hyperglycaemia
|
Macrosomia
|
Premature labour
|
Growth restriction
|
Retinopathy
|
Birth trauma
|
Hypertension/pre eclampsia
|
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
|
Nephropathy
|
Neonatal polycythaemia
|
Caesarian section
|
Neonatal hypocalcaemia
|
The maternal and perinatal mortality has improved
dramatically over the past century to such an extent
that in 1989 the St Vincent declaration stated that
as a five year goal the "outcome of diabetic pregnancy
should approximate that of a non diabetic pregnancy" ( 2)
However, 10 years later, a study from the Birmingham
Women's hospital showed the outcomes of stillbirth,
congenital abnormalities, neonatal death rate and perinatal
mortality remain higher than that of the background
population although the results had improved compared
to data 10 years previously ( 3).
The following table compares that data to results from
the North east and North west region of the country.
|
Diabetics
|
Hospital
population
|
Regional
(National)
|
North East
Region
|
North West
Region
|
Stillbirth rate/1000
|
11
|
9.0
|
5.5 (5.0)
|
19
|
25
|
NND/1000
|
23
|
12
|
5.4(6.8)
|
29
|
11
|
PMR/1000
|
34
|
21
|
9.9(8.3)
|
48
|
36
|
CAR/1000
|
97
|
|
9.5
|
83
|
94
|
CAR = Congnetial Anomaly Rate, NND =
Neonatal Death, PMR = Perinatal Mortality
Rate
The situation is not the same throughout the world
however, with outcome data from Norway almost the same
in diabetic as non diabetic pregnancies ( 4).
PERINATAL FORUM - SEPTEMBER 2001
Our September forum focused on some of the issues
that may contribute to our suboptimal outcomes in Britain.
Only pre-gestational diabetes was discussed. This can be largely divided into:
Type 1- this results from autoimmune destruction
of the insulin-producing islet cells. The condition
therefore requires insulin and tends to present in
childhood.
Type 2- this results from a state of relative insulin resistance. It was formerly
referred to as "maturity onset" but this is no longer the case and
data is fast emerging from the Children's hospital that it is becoming a disease
of the young as well (especially those from an Indo-Asian background). Sufferers
may be treated with diet, hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin.
One of the key messages from the forum was that ladies
with type 2 diabetes are almost twice as likely than
those with type 1 to have miscarriages and congenital
malformations. In addition their babies are more likely
to be large for gestational age and to be born before
37 weeks gestation ( 5).
Unfortunately type 2 diabetes has long been, misguidedly,
regarded by some as less severe than type 1 and this
is clearly not the case. Indeed part of the reason
for the adverse pregnancy outcome in this group is
the poor attendance for pre pregnancy care, later booking
for antenatal care and poor glycaemic control at booking.
References
1. The Centres for Disease Control. JAMA 1990; 264:437-40, Abstract
2. World Health Organisation (Europe) and International
Diabetes Federation (Europe). The St Vincent Declaration.
Diabetic Med 1990; 7:360-365.
3.Dunne F, Brydon P, Proffitt M, Smith T, Gee H, Holder
R. Approaching St Vincent. Diabetic medicine 2001;
18:333-334
4.Hawthorne G, Irgens L M, Lie R T. Outcome of pregnancy
in diabetic women in northeast England and Norway,
1994-7. BMJ 2000; 321:730-1, Abstract
5. Brydon P, Smith T, Proffitt M, Gee H, Holder R,
Dunne F. Pregnancy outcome in women with Type 2 Diabetes
mellitus needs to be addressed. IJCP September 2000;
54(7): 418-9, Abstract
|