Back
to Pregnancy Reviews
|
|
CURRENT PRACTICE
The majority of inductions in the West Midlands are
done using prostaglandin E2 (Prostin)
for cervical ripening and amniotomy followed by oxytocin
infusion. According to the Cochrane ( 1)
review, PGE2 improves the Bishop's Score whilst decreasing
the length of labour and the Caesarian section rate.
The manufacturer's recommendation of
repeat application have found their way into many labour
ward protocols but may contribute to the frequent instances
of uterine hyperstimulation (see below). A randomised
comparison ( 2)
found no clinical advantages in applying two vs one
dose only of PGE2, and observed that two doses were
more likely to result in passage of meconium and admission
to neonatal intensive care.
BISHOPS SCORE:
Parameter |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Dilatation |
< 1
cm |
1-2
cm |
2-4
cm |
> 4cm |
Length |
> 4 cm |
2-4 cm |
1-2 cm |
< 1cm |
Consistency |
Firm |
Average |
Soft |
- |
Position |
Posterior |
Mid |
Anterior |
|
Station |
-3 |
-2 |
-1,0 |
+1,+2 |
Bishops score can be used as a predictor of
successful induction. Caesarian section rate
is significantly related to a low bishops score.
|
OTHER METHODS
Mechanical methods such as hygroscopic
dilators ( 3)
and Foley's
catheters ( 4)
- appear as effective as intracervical gels at ripening
the cervix . Regular 'stretch
and sweep' from 39 weeks may reduce the number
of women who reach 41 weeks gestation ( 5)
but can result in discomfort and bleeding, and a
recent systematic
review ( 6)
failed to find appreciable benefits.
NEW METHODS
Dinoprostone (Propess ( 7),
Cervidil) has a mechanism which slowly releases 10mg
of prostaglandin E2 over 12-24 hours. It has a thread
which enables it to be removed if uterine hyperstimulation
occurs. It has been used in America, but its hoped
application as an outpatient cervical ripening agent
is doubtful because of high removal rates after onset
of contractions ( 8).
Mifepristone (RU486) is a progesterone
antagonist used in therapeutic abortions. There is
recent work to suggest that its cervical softening
properties can also be applied for induction
of labour ( 9)
at term. A recent randomized trial ( 10)
showed a modest effect on cervical ripening when given
24 hours before labor induction, appearing to reduce
the need for misoprostol and oxytocin compared with
placebo. However, there were also more non-reassuring
fetal heart rate patterns and uterine contractile abnormalities
occurred in mifepristone-treated subjects ( 11)
Misoprostol is
a PGE1 analogue which is being used for 1st and 2nd
trimester terminations, although it is not yet licensed
for this use. For induction of labour, there is evidence
of shorter labour-to-induction intervals with less
need for formal amniotomy and oxytocin augmentation,
but also a higher incidence of uterine hyperstimulation.
( 12 13).
A large RCT is awaited to determine the optimum dosage.
Misoprostol is heat stable and, unlike Prostin, does
not require refrigeration and has a long shelf life.
This and its lower unit cost would make it particularly
attractive for use in developing countries.
Cost Difference
Prostin pessary |
1mg |
£14.52 |
|
2mg |
£16.00 |
Misoprostol |
2mg |
£16.00 |
Propess |
50mcg |
£ 0.04 |
Ref: BRITISH NATIONAL FORMULARY
|
References
1. Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. Cochrane
Pregnancy and Child Birth Data Base: Oxford.
2. MacKenzie IZ, Burns E (1997) "Randomised trial
of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction
of labour:1. Clinical outcome." Br J Obstet Gynaecol
1997 Sep;104(9):1062-7,Abstract
3. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Connor PM, (1992), "Hygroscopic
cervical dilators and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction
cervical ripening. A randomized, prospective comparison," J
Reprod Med 1992 Apr;37(4):355-9, Abstract
4. St Onge RD, Connors GT, (1995), "Preinduction
cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin
E2 gel versus the Foley catheter." Am J Obstet
Gynecol, Feb;172(2 Pt 1):687-90, Abstract
5. Cammu H, Haitsma V, (1998), Sweeping of the membranes
at 39 weeks in nulliparous women: a randomised controlled
trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol Jan;105(1):41-4, Abstract
6. Boulvain M, Irion O, (2000), Stripping/sweeping
the membranes for inducing labour or preventing post-term
pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000451, Abstract
7. Calder AA. Review of prostaglandin use in labour
induction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(S15):1997;8-12.
8. Rayburn WF, Tassone S, Pearman C, (2000), "Is
cervidil appropriate for outpatient cervical ripening?" Obstet
Gynecol, Apr 1;95(4 Suppl 1):S63, Abstract
9. Elliott CL, Brennand JE, Calder AA, (1998),The
effects of mifepristone on cervical ripening and labor
induction in primigravidae. Obstet Gynecol Nov;92(5):804-9, Abstract
10. Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Mishell DR, (2000), Mifepristone
for preinduction cervical ripening beyond 41 weeks'
gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol
Oct 1;96(4):543-548, Abstract
11. Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Mishell DR, (2000), Mifepristone
for preinduction cervical ripening beyond 41 weeks'
gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol
Oct 1;96(4):543-548, Abstract
12. Wing DA, 1999,Labor induction with misoprostol.
Am J Obstet Gynecol Aug;181(2):339-45, Abstract
13. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, Delke I,
Gaudier FL, (1997), "Misoprostol for cervical
ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis." Obstet
Gynecol Apr;89(4):633-42, Abstract
|